Thread:CavaX/@comment-28861987-20180530152227/@comment-28958262-20190428055457

Tangential to the discussion above, but as an FYI, if a project is dead, is not historically significant, and has no surviving derivatives, I have been adding these to Category:Pages for deletion since I can't delete these pages myself. I will also begin adding unneeded files to the category.

PS Based on its GitHub activity, NimbleX (on Linux Wiki and on The Linux Mausoleum Wiki) may not be dead yet. Based on its SVN activity, Momonga Linux (on Linux Wiki and on The Linux Mausoleum Wiki) may also not be dead yet.

The Linspire and Freespire trademarks have been resurrected by a third party unrelated to the original Linspire, Inc. These distro articles should probably be removed from The Linux Mausoleum Wiki given that distros with these names are now being released again.[1 ][2 ]

ConnochaetOS's most recent release (14.2) is based on Slackware's most recent stable release (14.2), so unless the developer has stated the project is dead or on indefinite hiatus, it should probably be removed from The Linux Mausoleum Wiki (in addition to an article on The Linux Mausoleum Wiki, it still has an article on Linux Wiki). ConnochaetOS was added to The Linux Mausoleum Wiki prior to its most recent release. GNUSTEP live CD's most recent release (2.5) is based on Debian's most recent stable branch (9), so unless the developer has stated the project is dead or on indefinite hiatus, it should also probably be removed from The Linux Mausoleum Wiki. GNUSTEP live CD was added to The Linux Mausoleum Wiki prior to its most recent release.

My personal preference would be to get rid of The Linux Mausoleum Wiki, and have all articles on one wiki, and trim the number of articles on the wiki to only include both noteworthy active projects as well as dead but influential projects, and also preserve any articles that contain compiled information that can't be easily found collected in one location anywhere else online. In my opinion, there are currently too many articles to maintain given the sporadic activity on the wiki (not just in terms of keeping the articles up-to-date, but in terms of fleshing out articles that could use more detail), and I posit that several of the articles are of little-to-no added value and could be deleted with no detrimental impact.